Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] DSPBRIDGE: do not call follow_page

2010-12-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Eliminate the call to follow_page. Instead, use the page > information that was kept during the proc_map call. > This also has the advantage that users can now only > specify memory areas that were previously mapped. > > Signed-off-by: Ohad

Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] DSPBRIDGE: do not call follow_page

2010-07-25 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, Just for the record, I found a problem in this patch. The next patch in the series overrides it, so it's not that important, unless somebody picks only this patch. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > @@ -537,23 +606,30 @@ dsp_status proc_enum_nodes(void *hprocessor, void

[PATCH v3 3/7] DSPBRIDGE: do not call follow_page

2010-05-27 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
Eliminate the call to follow_page. Instead, use the page information that was kept during the proc_map call. This also has the advantage that users can now only specify memory areas that were previously mapped. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen --- You can also reach me at < ohadb at ti dot com >.