On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:40:39PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 05:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Applied, but don't bury new patches into the middle of old threads -
> >it's a good way to get your patch ignored.
> Okay. I thought only one patch had to be redone on top of the oth
On Thursday 10 July 2014 05:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:52:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
Add fixed_uV fields for dcdc5 and dcdc6.
Applied, but don't bury new patches into the middle of old threads -
it's a good way to get your patch ignored.
Okay. I thought only one patch
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:52:59PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> Add fixed_uV fields for dcdc5 and dcdc6.
Applied, but don't bury new patches into the middle of old threads -
it's a good way to get your patch ignored.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Add fixed_uV fields for dcdc5 and dcdc6.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Changes from V3:
* Rebased to Latest for/tps65218 branch.
drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c
