On 15 November 2012 11:39, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> I do agree description is missing, again I thought I had done this
>> somewhere but looks like I didn't, will update these. If you think
>> these should be different patches please let me know, otherwise I
>> would like to keep a single *document
Hi Omar,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 03:54, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Most of the above questions imply this patch not only converts the
>> iommu to runtime PM, but may carry additional changes that may imply
>> previous implementation is sub-op
Hi Ohad,
On 14 November 2012 03:54, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna
> wrote:
>> Use runtime PM functionality interfaced with hwmod enable/idle
>> functions, to replace direct clock operations and sysconfig
>> handling.
>>
>> Dues to reset
Hi Omar,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> Use runtime PM functionality interfaced with hwmod enable/idle
> functions, to replace direct clock operations and sysconfig
> handling.
>
> Dues to reset sequence, pm_runtime_put_sync must be used, to avoid
> possible operation
Use runtime PM functionality interfaced with hwmod enable/idle
functions, to replace direct clock operations and sysconfig
handling.
Dues to reset sequence, pm_runtime_put_sync must be used, to avoid
possible operations with the module under reset.
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna
---
arch/arm/
