Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API

2015-06-18 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Dave Gerlach d-gerl...@ti.com wrote: Oh sorry about. Pulled your for-next, tried it out, everything looks good to me, thanks! Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API

2015-06-18 Thread Dave Gerlach
Ohad, On 06/18/2015 04:04 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: Hi Dave, On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Dave Gerlach d-gerl...@ti.com wrote: Allow users of remoteproc the ability to get a handle to an rproc by passing a phandle supplied in the user's device tree node. This is useful in situations

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API

2015-06-18 Thread Ohad Ben-Cohen
Hi Dave, On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Dave Gerlach d-gerl...@ti.com wrote: Allow users of remoteproc the ability to get a handle to an rproc by passing a phandle supplied in the user's device tree node. This is useful in situations that require manual booting of the rproc. This patch

[PATCH v5 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API

2015-06-17 Thread Dave Gerlach
Allow users of remoteproc the ability to get a handle to an rproc by passing a phandle supplied in the user's device tree node. This is useful in situations that require manual booting of the rproc. This patch uses the code removed by commit 40e575b1d0b3 (remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put