Hi Tony,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Kadiyala, Kishore
wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Tony Lindgren [110225 12:42]:
>>> * Kishore Kadiyala [110225 09:00]:
>>> > +static int omap_mmc_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *hsmmcinfo)
>>> ...
>>>
Hi Tony,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [110225 12:42]:
>> * Kishore Kadiyala [110225 09:00]:
>> > +static int omap_mmc_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *hsmmcinfo)
>> ...
>>
>> > + static int mmc_num;
>> > +
>> > + c += mmc_num;
>>
>> This does not
* Tony Lindgren [110225 12:42]:
> * Kishore Kadiyala [110225 09:00]:
> > +static int omap_mmc_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *hsmmcinfo)
> ...
>
> > + static int mmc_num;
> > +
> > + c += mmc_num;
>
> This does not look right..
So since mmc_num is static, it gets initialized to 0, then i
* Kishore Kadiyala [110225 09:00]:
> +static int omap_mmc_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *hsmmcinfo)
...
> + static int mmc_num;
> +
> + c += mmc_num;
This does not look right..
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to m
Changes involves:
1) Remove controller reset in devices.c which is taken care of
by hwmod framework.
2) Omap2420 platform consists of mmc block as in omap1 and not the
hsmmc block as present in omap2430, omap3, omap4 platforms.
Removing all base address macro defines except keeping one for
