On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 21:53 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Luciano Coelho
> wrote:
> >> + int ret = wl->if_ops->power(wl, true);
> >
> > I think it look nicer if you keep the "int ret" in one line by itself
> > and then do a ret = wl->if_ops... on another o
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Luciano Coelho
wrote:
>> + int ret = wl->if_ops->power(wl, true);
>
> I think it look nicer if you keep the "int ret" in one line by itself
> and then do a ret = wl->if_ops... on another one.
Fixed.
>> +static int wl1271_sdio_power_on(struct wl1271 *wl)
>> {
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 01:22 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Make it possible for the set power method to indicate a
> success/failure return value. This is needed to support
> more complex power on/off operations such as SDIO
> power manipulations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
> ---
Some
Make it possible for the set power method to indicate a
success/failure return value. This is needed to support
more complex power on/off operations such as SDIO
power manipulations.
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
---
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271.h |2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/wl12x
