On 3/6/2013 9:45 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
binding.
Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
Okay the bindings the documented after they are used leading to some
confusion. This patch should be moved up the series. As I noted in my
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:24:06PM +, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Matt == Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com writes:
Matt The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
Matt binding.
Matt Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
Matt ---
Matt
Matt == Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com writes:
Hi,
Matt +edma: edma@4900 {
Matt +reg = 0x4900 0x1;
Matt +interrupt-parent = intc;
Matt +interrupts = 12 13 14;
Probably interrupt-parent should be removed from the example as well to
match am33xx.dtsi
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 06:53:03AM +, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 3/6/2013 9:45 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
binding.
Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
Okay the bindings the documented after they are used leading to some
The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
binding.
Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 49 +
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Matt == Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com writes:
Matt The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
Matt binding.
Matt Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
Matt ---
Matt Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 49
+
Matt 1 file changed,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:24:06PM +, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Matt == Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com writes:
Matt The binding definition is based on the generic DMA controller
Matt binding.
Matt Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com
Matt ---
Matt
