On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:10:47AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com writes:
The patch series does the following
- Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected.
- In case of i2c
On Monday 11 June 2012 09:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Agree,
These are only fixes can it be considered for rc3?
Baking in linux-next and considering rc3 don't match; baking needs
time, rc3 is soon. I've put the patches now into my -next branch for
more exposure.
Thanks.
I am still uncertain
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com writes:
The patch series does the following
- Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected.
- In case of i2c remove register access was done without any
get_sync fix the same.
- Folds
Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com writes:
The patch series does the following
- Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected.
- In case of i2c remove register access was done without any
get_sync fix the same.
- Folds a patch from Tasslehoff to prevent any merge conflicts.
- Prevents
The patch series does the following
- Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected.
- In case of i2c remove register access was done without any
get_sync fix the same.
- Folds a patch from Tasslehoff to prevent any merge conflicts.
- Prevents the XDUF flag to be set if the underflow
