On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 17:21 +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Tero,
I have a few remarks regarding the genericity of this code. I think it
is better if the code in powerdomain.c stays generic and that the
platform specific checks and operations be moved in the specific
functions (via the
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 17:21 +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Tero,
I have a few remarks regarding the genericity of this code. I think it
is better if the code in powerdomain.c stays generic and that the
platform specific checks and operations be moved in the specific
functions (via the
Hi Tero,
I have a few remarks regarding the genericity of this code. I think it
is better if the code in powerdomain.c stays generic and that the
platform specific checks and operations be moved in the specific
functions (via the pwrdm_ops struct).
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Tero Kristo
On OMAP4+, device wide off-mode has its own enable mechanism in addition
to powerdomain target states. This patch adds support for this on top
of functional power states by overloading the OFF state for core pwrdm.
On pwrdm level, the deepest power state supported by core pwrdm is OSWR.
When user
