Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] omap: igep0020: minor refactoring

2011-05-16 Thread Enric Balletbò i Serra
2011/5/15 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de: On Sunday 15 May 2011, m...@compulab.co.il wrote: We can keep all the data structures that differ between IGEP2 and IGEP3. However, this significantly reduces the benifit of the series. There's already code in the IGEP2 that differentiates between HW

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] omap: igep0020: minor refactoring

2011-05-15 Thread mike
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 08:44:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 12 May 2011, Mike Rapoport wrote: @@ -299,17 +299,14 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { static struct gpio_led igep_gpio_leds[] = { [0] = { .name =

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] omap: igep0020: minor refactoring

2011-05-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 15 May 2011, m...@compulab.co.il wrote: We can keep all the data structures that differ between IGEP2 and IGEP3. However, this significantly reduces the benifit of the series. There's already code in the IGEP2 that differentiates between HW revisions, so anyway the board support will

Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] omap: igep0020: minor refactoring

2011-05-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 12 May 2011, Mike Rapoport wrote: @@ -299,17 +299,14 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { static struct gpio_led igep_gpio_leds[] = { [0] = { .name = gpio-led:red:d0, - .gpio = IGEP2_GPIO_LED0_RED,