Hi,
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:41 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > when we finally move to struct irq_data, the below could
> > be used. BTW, Thomas do you have any plans for exposing
> > irq_data_to_desc() ?
>
> The general idea is to move to struct irq_data sooner rather than later
> (all the existin
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:36:04PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> when we finally move to struct irq_data, the below could
> be used. BTW, Thomas do you have any plans for exposing
> irq_data_to_desc() ?
The general idea is to move to struct irq_data sooner rather than later
(all the existing MFD d
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:14:16PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
I dropped the twl6030-irq.c changes because that
thing is a bit messy. I hope the original author
will feel inspired and fix that one up.
Anyway, twl4030-irq.c seems to be going to the
right direction now. Thanks to Mark Brown fo
Hi all,
I dropped the twl6030-irq.c changes because that
thing is a bit messy. I hope the original author
will feel inspired and fix that one up.
Anyway, twl4030-irq.c seems to be going to the
right direction now. Thanks to Mark Brown for
pointing out the need to drop the locking and
implement bu
