"G, Manjunath Kondaiah" writes:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:45:33PM -0700, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
>> Hi Manjunath,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah
>> wrote:
>> > Kevin,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> Here's a first whac
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:45:33PM -0700, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > Kevin,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
>
Hi Manjunath,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
>> decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
>>
>> The main RFC is in t
Kevin,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
> decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
>
> The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
> misc. omap_device cleanups that m
Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
misc. omap_device cleanups that make the last patch cleaner and
clearer. It's really the last patch that does th
