On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:18:04PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
I believe you meant something like below, I'll get back to this in a
little while. Have lots to test:
Yes, that looks like what I'd expect.
Good, I'll clean the patches
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I believe you meant something like below, I'll get back to this in a
> little while. Have lots to test:
Yes, that looks like what I'd expect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a m
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:38:28AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 23:58 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:14:19PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> +static void twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct sih_agent*agent = get_
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 23:58 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:14:19PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > +static void twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
> > +{
> > + struct sih_agent*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&age
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:14:19PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> +static void twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct sih_agent*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&agent->irq_lock);
> +}
I suspect you need to do some sort of sync with the
drop all the locking around mask/unmask and
implement bus_lock and bus_sync_unlock methods.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
---
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c | 30 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/tw
