Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 10:54 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
and why the WFI is not used ?
Daniel Lezcano (7):
ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle -
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
Thanks. Will have a look at your series.
A couple a things call my
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
Thanks. Will have a
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0
only
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the
On 03/21/2012 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
On 03/21/2012 11:49 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
On 03/21/2012 02:19 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jean Pihet jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit
On 03/21/2012 10:54 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
18 matches
Mail list logo
