On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 03/21/2012 10:41 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>>> wrote:
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remo
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 10:41 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>> wrote:
>>> The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
>>> ---
>> It is used
On 03/21/2012 10:41 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
It is used during the registration. This field has been very useful for
debug when need to
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
It is used during the registration. This field has been very useful for
debug when need to disable a C-state etc.
So unless and until ther
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
index cfdbb86.
