Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-02 19:00:02)
> On 20:35-20130402, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> > On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45)
> > >>On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >>>OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks li
On 20:35-20130402, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45)
> >>On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>>OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that
> >>>mean for Andrii's patchset?
>
On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45)
On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that
mean for Andrii's patchset?
Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of a
On 13:15-20130402, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 06:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that
> >>mean for Andrii's patchset?
> >Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the app
On 04/02/2013 06:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that
mean for Andrii's patchset?
Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of an "Super
regulator" controlling "sub regulator
On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
> OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that
> mean for Andrii's patchset?
Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of an "Super
regulator" controlling "sub regulators", I think, in-line with your
view, we should
On 14:34-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 12:28:20)
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Turquette
> > wrote:
> > > Let's figure out what is happening to the VC/VP code first and then
> > > figure out what to do about ABB.
> > >
> > http://picpaste.com/KmqD
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Andrii,
>
> Sorry to nitpick further but this your replies look very non-standard.
> Typically a right chevron and a space is used to indent replies instead
> of a tab. Something like this:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtique
Andrii,
Sorry to nitpick further but this your replies look very non-standard.
Typically a right chevron and a space is used to indent replies instead
of a tab. Something like this:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette#Reply_Level_Indication
Quoting Andrii Tseglytskyi (2013-04-01
