Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:52:58PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:21:20PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Or if those EVM's SDP's can route TWL4030 audio connections more
flexible than Beagle but somewhat similar manner, then probably have one
single machine driver
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:25:59PM -0500, George G. Davis wrote:
Is someone working on updating ASoC drivers for OMAP TWL4030 based
boards as recommended above? Just curious since I already made the
mistake of creating my own OMAP3 EVM ASoC driver w/o checking the
list first. : /
Not to my
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:27:44 +0100
ext Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:25:59PM -0500, George G. Davis wrote:
Is someone working on updating ASoC drivers for OMAP TWL4030 based
boards as recommended above? Just curious since I already made the
mistake
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 22:25:59 ext George G. Davis wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:52:58PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:21:20PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Or if those EVM's SDP's can route TWL4030 audio connections more
flexible than Beagle but
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:21:20PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Or if those EVM's SDP's can route TWL4030 audio connections more
flexible than Beagle but somewhat similar manner, then probably have one
single machine driver for all EVM's?
Otherwise it doesn't make very much sense to have n