On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:36 AM, mark gross <640e9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:12:39PM -0700, Brian Swetland wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:04 PM, mark gross <640e9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There are many wakeup events possible in a typical system --
>> >> keypress
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:12:39PM -0700, Brian Swetland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:04 PM, mark gross <640e9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> There are many wakeup events possible in a typical system --
> >> keypresses or other input events, network traffic, telephony events,
> >> media event
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:04 PM, mark gross <640e9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are many wakeup events possible in a typical system --
>> keypresses or other input events, network traffic, telephony events,
>> media events (fill audio buffer, fill video decoder buffer, etc), and
>> I think requ
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:05:18AM -0700, Brian Swetland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:05:14 -0700
> > Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> >> > The user-space suspend daemon avoids losing wake-events by using
> >> > fcntl(F_OWNER) to ensure it gets a sig
