Am 28.02.2011 09:43, schrieb Felipe Balbi:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:41:47PM +, Pavol Kurina wrote:
Felipe Balbi ti.com> writes:
struct usb_request's list_head is supposed to be
used only by gadget drivers, but musb is abusing
that. Give struct musb_request its own list_head
and prevent
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:40:59PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > /* if the hardware doesn't have the request, easy ... */
> > > - if (musb_ep->req_list.next != &request->list || musb_ep->busy)
> > > + if
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > /* if the hardware doesn't have the request, easy ... */
> > - if (musb_ep->req_list.next != &request->list || musb_ep->busy)
> > + if (musb_ep->req_list.next != &req->list || musb_ep->busy)
> >
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:36:53PM +0100, Pavol Kurina wrote:
> Am 28.02.2011 09:43, schrieb Felipe Balbi:
> >On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:41:47PM +, Pavol Kurina wrote:
> >>Felipe Balbi ti.com> writes:
> >>>struct usb_request's list_head is supposed to be
> >>>used only by gadget drivers, but
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:41:47PM +, Pavol Kurina wrote:
> Felipe Balbi ti.com> writes:
> >
> > struct usb_request's list_head is supposed to be
> > used only by gadget drivers, but musb is abusing
> > that. Give struct musb_request its own list_head
> > and prevent musb from poking into oth
Felipe Balbi ti.com> writes:
>
> struct usb_request's list_head is supposed to be
> used only by gadget drivers, but musb is abusing
> that. Give struct musb_request its own list_head
> and prevent musb from poking into other driver's
> business.
Hi,
I think, the patch misses to fix the usage o
struct usb_request's list_head is supposed to be
used only by gadget drivers, but musb is abusing
that. Give struct musb_request its own list_head
and prevent musb from poking into other driver's
business.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
---
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h |4 +-
drivers/usb/
