On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:38:12 -0700
"ext David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My set was basically doing all gpiolib conversions in one patch and the
> > set was grouped so that one patch for all OMAP1 boards (all of them are
> > in mainline), separate patches for couple OMAP2 boards and
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>
> Hi David
>
> Did you know what? I was doing something like similar conversion patches
> just few days ago but didn't find yet time to finalize them and fix
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c for omap_[request | free]_gpio :-)
Sounds ... oddly famili
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:50:54 -0700
"ext David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following this are four patches matching $SUBJECT:
>
> - remove omap_set_gpio_dataout() and omap_get_gpio_datain()
> ... same call syntax, different name, minor code shrink
> - use gpio_direction_input()
Following this are four patches matching $SUBJECT:
- remove omap_set_gpio_dataout() and omap_get_gpio_datain()
... same call syntax, different name, minor code shrink
- use gpio_direction_input()
... minor call syntax change, otherwise not interesting
- use gpio_direction_output
