Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:57:04AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: 2011/5/4 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com: * Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110504 00:37]: 2011/5/3 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com: Are you OK with a move of the current OMAP GPIO drivers (rather ugly) into

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:42:39AM +0200, Kevin Hilman wrote: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: [...] For TI I guess this currently means you simply cannot work on GPIO stuff until you know where to go with it unless you allow the OMAP GPIO authors to keep churning in

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-19 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:08:41PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:42:39AM +0200, Kevin Hilman wrote: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: [...] For TI I guess this currently means you simply cannot work on GPIO stuff until you know where to go with

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-12 Thread Kevin Hilman
Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: [...] For TI I guess this currently means you simply cannot work on GPIO stuff until you know where to go with it unless you allow the OMAP GPIO authors to keep churning in arch/arm/*... That's unless Grant is OK with us moving stuff into

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110504 00:37]: 2011/5/3 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com: Are you OK with a move of the current OMAP GPIO drivers (rather ugly) into drivers/gpio first, followed by the cleanup/restructure patches? In my case I actually did some cleanup after moving

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-03 Thread Kevin Hilman
Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: 2011/4/26 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com: * Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110423 01:32]: Since you'll probably be dependent on stuff happening in my patches to move stuff into drivers/gpio I'll be happy to carry the patches in my

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-05-03 Thread Linus Walleij
2011/5/3 Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com: Are you OK with a move of the current OMAP GPIO drivers (rather ugly) into drivers/gpio first, followed by the cleanup/restructure patches? In my case I actually did some cleanup after moving the driver for U300, but I think this is a question to the GPIO

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-27 Thread Linus Walleij
2011/4/26 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com: * Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110423 01:32]: Since you'll probably be dependent on stuff happening in my patches to move stuff into drivers/gpio I'll be happy to carry the patches in my gpio-consolidation branch with Tony's ACKs if need be.

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-26 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [110423 01:32]: 2011/4/21 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com: * Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [110421 02:56]: - Move it to drivers/gpio - Further consolidate with whatever common GPIO code might   be coming up. Is the above order required?

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-23 Thread Linus Walleij
2011/4/21 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com: * Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [110421 02:56]: - Move it to drivers/gpio - Further consolidate with whatever common GPIO code might   be coming up. Is the above order required? Yes please. Otherwise we'll have more of the crazy churn in

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-22 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [110421 18:12]: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: Saw that, looks good :) Need to post it also to lakml BTW. Yeah, I only posted to l-o so far because it's not done. I only removed a few of the #ifdef sections, there are still several more to do. Oh I

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-21 Thread Kevin Hilman
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: * Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [110421 02:56]: Hi Tony, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: * Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [110418 18:00]: From: Charulatha V ch...@ti.com Use PM runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver. ...

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-20 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Tony, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: * Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [110418 18:00]: From: Charulatha V ch...@ti.com Use PM runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver. ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c |6 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 22 +-

Re: [v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-20 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [110421 02:56]: Hi Tony, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes: * Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [110418 18:00]: From: Charulatha V ch...@ti.com Use PM runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver. ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c |

[v2 0/7] OMAP: GPIO: Use PM runtime framework

2011-04-18 Thread Varadarajan, Charulatha
From: Charulatha V ch...@ti.com Use PM runtime framework in OMAP GPIO driver. Patch series is based on mainline rc3 following commit commit a1b49cb7e2a7961ec3aa8b64860bf480d4ec9077 Merge branch 'i2c-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jdelvare/staging Changes in