RE: 34xx off-mode support fixes

2008-07-04 Thread Tero.Kristo
>Do you have any guesses what is wrong in Rajendras cpuidle >code? Is it that dma save/restore? At least I couldn't figure >it out from your patches. Not sure, one possible cause is that cpuidle code is calling pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(), I recall having some issues if I tried calling this funct

Re: 34xx off-mode support fixes

2008-07-03 Thread Högander Jouni
Hi Tero, "ext Tero Kristo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > This patch set contains some experimental fixes for the cpu-idle support from > Rajendra Nayak. With this patch set, all power domains enter OFF mode and > recover from it, at least while using suspend and/or dynamic idle. If you >

34xx off-mode support fixes

2008-07-03 Thread Tero Kristo
Hi, This patch set contains some experimental fixes for the cpu-idle support from Rajendra Nayak. With this patch set, all power domains enter OFF mode and recover from it, at least while using suspend and/or dynamic idle. If you are using these patches, you should disable CPU_IDLE support from ke