Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com writes:
From: Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com
Subject: RE: [ARM][OMAP] TWL4030 IRQ
To: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Russell,
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c | 55
++--
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
index bae61b2..4bb1ea7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
+++
Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com writes:
Kevin/Vikram,
Can this patch be included on omap_pm branch to check for any regression?
Sure, I have it applied to the PM branch locally, but before I push,
can you (or Russell) send me a descriptive changelog for this patch.
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:36 AM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ARM][OMAP] TWL4030 IRQ
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:57:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:16:52PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
After digging a bit, the proposed twl_irq change would need some major
changes.
1. All the T2(TWL)drivers ( rtc, madc, bci, gpio, keypad, usb,
And here it is - I've only build-tested it so far.
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c | 55
++--
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
index bae61b2..4bb1ea7 100644
---
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:04:53PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Russell,
Just a question here.
In the enable_irq(irq) and disable_irq(irq) call tree, internally there are
calls to
the interrupt controller chip.
In disable_irq() path:
desc-chip-disable(irq);
And in
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:51:09AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
And if you look at the OMAP's MPU irq_chip implementation, these are
not populated either. We rely on the default lazy enable via unmask
and the lazy disable.
There's no lazy enable - it's immediate. There's only lazy disable.
--
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:51:09AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
And if you look at the OMAP's MPU irq_chip implementation, these are
not populated either. We rely on the default lazy enable via unmask
and the lazy disable.
There's no
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:37:45AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Russell,
After digging a bit, the proposed twl_irq change would need some major
1. All the T2(TWL)drivers ( rtc, madc, bci, gpio, keypad, usb, mmc)needs
2.Above also helps to have useful entries like /proc/interrupts/rtc
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:16:52PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
After digging a bit, the proposed twl_irq change would need some major
changes.
1. All the T2(TWL)drivers ( rtc, madc, bci, gpio, keypad, usb, mmc)needs
modification.Currently twl_irq fw implements kind of twl4030_irq_chip
Russell,
After digging a bit, the proposed twl_irq change would need some major changes.
1. All the T2(TWL)drivers ( rtc, madc, bci, gpio, keypad, usb, mmc)needs
modification. Currently twl_irq fw implements kind of twl4030_irq_chip which
allows all the T2 drivers to get virtual interrupt
12 matches
Mail list logo
