RE: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup

2009-03-24 Thread Kanigeri, Hari
s, Hari > -Original Message- > From: Ameya Palande [mailto:ameya.pala...@nokia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 6:56 AM > To: Kanigeri, Hari > Cc: Ameya Palande; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup > > Hi

Re: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup

2009-03-24 Thread Ameya Palande
Hi Hari, ext Kanigeri, Hari wrote: > Hi Amey, > >> I am trying to understand this patch. >> I see that pCtxtclosed is passed to DRV_RemoveProcContext() function >> but it is not used anywhere inside it. I was expecting to see a >> statement there which should free its memory. > > This pointer is

RE: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup

2009-03-24 Thread Kanigeri, Hari
rnel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup > > Hi Hari, > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Kanigeri, Hari > wrote: > >                DRV_RemoveProcContext((struct DRV_OBJECT *)hDrvObject, > >                                     pC

Re: [PATCH] [OMAPZOOM]DSPBRIDGE bug in Bridge exit cleanup

2009-03-24 Thread Ameya Palande
Hi Hari, On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Kanigeri, Hari wrote: >                DRV_RemoveProcContext((struct DRV_OBJECT *)hDrvObject, >                                     pCtxtclosed, (void *)pCtxtclosed->pid); I am trying to understand this patch. I see that pCtxtclosed is passed to DRV_Remo