Santosh,
-Original Message-
From: Shilimkar, Santosh
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Pagare, Abhijit; Paul Walmsley; Pagare, Abhijit
Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4
-Original Message-
From: Shilimkar, Santosh
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Pagare, Abhijit; Paul Walmsley; Pagare, Abhijit
Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4 build
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
I think the latest patch-set that I had posted has this change in it.
You can refer to the patch in the link below
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=126088474831309w=2
Looks like this patch had somehow not made it into the
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
So now it can be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1.
I think CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant in that case and should be
removed. A patch would be essential to take care of that in the places
where it is
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4 build failure
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
So now it can be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1.
I think CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant in that case and should be
removed. A patch would
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Walmsley
I guess the rollup should probably be CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX. Do you happen to
know whether software
Hello Paul,
-Original Message-
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:50 AM
To: Pagare, Abhijit
Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4 build failure
Hello Paul,
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:44 AM
To: abhijit.pag...@ti.com
Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
Abhijit,
snip
I had used this flag earlier as there was nothing fixed as to name it as ES1
that time. So now it can
be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1. I think
CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant
in that case and should be removed. A patch would be essential to take
