RE: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-16 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
-Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shahar Lev Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:46 PM To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm; Tony Lindgren; Shahar Lev Subject: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX

Re: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-16 Thread Vitaly Wool
Hi Shahar, Tony, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: * Shahar Lev sha...@wizery.com [110614 06:21]: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: This your should try to remove as it won't work nicely for supporting various

Re: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-16 Thread Shahar Lev
[sp] Could this be renamed simply as: OMAP3EVM_WL12XX?     OR is there a specific reason to add vendor/manufacturers' name     to the defintion? I don't mind changing it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-14 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Shahar Lev sha...@wizery.com [110614 05:12]: +config OMAP3EVM_MISTRAL_WL12XX + bool Enable Mistral WL12XX daughter board support + depends on MACH_OMAP3EVM + help + Support for the Mistral WL12XX daughter board. + This extension board which supports both WLAN and

Re: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-14 Thread Shahar Lev
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: This your should try to remove as it won't work nicely for supporting various boards with the same kernel as we already do with omap2plus_defconfig. Can you somehow detect the daughter board dynamically and then set the

Re: [PATCH] omap3evm: Add Mistral WL12XX config support

2011-06-14 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Shahar Lev sha...@wizery.com [110614 06:21]: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote: This your should try to remove as it won't work nicely for supporting various boards with the same kernel as we already do with omap2plus_defconfig. Can you somehow