Hi,
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:05 PM
Looks like the significant difference is the use of CLKCTRL = 0x2 (+
AUTOCOUNT). Maybe there is some SDRC bug related to CLKCTRL = 0x2 that
causes this
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:05 PM
Looks like the significant difference is the use of CLKCTRL = 0x2 (+
AUTOCOUNT). Maybe there is some SDRC bug related to CLKCTRL = 0x2 that
Hello Richard,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:07 PM
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
I've only seen the condition along side of very aggressive SDRC_POWER
settings.
Could
From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:07 PM
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
I've only seen the condition along side of very aggressive SDRC_POWER
settings.
Could you send over the SDRC_POWER settings that cause this problem?
Woodruff, Richard r-woodru...@ti.com writes:
Hi Paul,
Hm, seems my mailing is out to lunch today... I'll be worse than normal in
protocol and top post.
I've seen this issue on a couple custom boards. In these instances
I've not had access to boot loaders. I would expect this issue
Mike,
From: Mike Chan [mailto:m...@android.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:42 PM
+/* Kick DLL state machine if lock not started */
+kick_dll:
+ ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl /* get dlla addr */
+ ldr r5, [r4]/* grab value */
+ mov r6, r5
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:03 AM
I've seen this issue on a couple custom boards. In these instances
I've not had access to boot loaders. I would expect this issue
would show up in the wild in some devices. It might be ok to
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Woodruff, Richard
Sent: 2009年6月19日 2:55
To: Mike Chan; Kevin Hilman
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Mike Chan
Subject: RE: [PATCH -pm 1/2] SDRC: check for stuck DLL
Hi,
From: Wang Sawsd-A24013 [mailto:cqw...@motorola.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:27 PM
+ str r6, [r4]/* restore old value */
Richard, I think here it should be: str r5, [r4], not r6.
I modifed this when I was verifying your patch.
You are correct that was
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
I've only seen the condition along side of very aggressive SDRC_POWER
settings.
Could you send over the SDRC_POWER settings that cause this problem?
thanks,
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi,
a few questions for Mike and Richard:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote:
From: Richard Woodruff r-woodru...@ti.com
I'm thinking DLL state is an exceptional condition which happens based
on some wrong early programming when initially setting DLL up. Some
kind of race between
11 matches
Mail list logo