On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
> It shouldn't take all that long. I will internally send you the
> auto-generated file having the dependency details soon. Do let me know
> if you want any modification in it. If all that's done in a couple of
> days then the patch above can be skippe
Hello Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:40 AM
> To: Pagare, Abhijit
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Add
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
> I checked the dependency patch-set. The complete stuff looks really
> neat. Applying OMAP4 on top of this would be feasible. The only thing is
> that till the point the OMAP4 dependency patches go in the "autodeps"
> variable in arch/
Hello Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 4:40 AM
> To: Pagare, Abhijit
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Add
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:02 PM
>
> > But really, I'd rather not apply this patch. The best way forward is to
> > apply a patch that adds the OMAP4 wakeup and
Hi Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:02 PM
> To: Pagare, Abhijit
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Add
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, Abhijit Pagare wrote:
> A check is added for avoiding the sleep/wakeup dependency updates
> for OMAP4 as the structures for the dependencies are currently absent.
As a threshold matter, code and data added in temporary hack patches like
this need to be marked
