[snip]
> >
> > Now I really started liking this patch.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij
>
> Which shall be interpreted as for the patch with the above code, not
> the one which is subject for this post I believe.
>
> Pierre, I can't locate your patches for some reason, care to repost
> them?
https://
2011/1/26 Linus Walleij :
> 2011/1/25 Tardy, Pierre :
>> @@ -1231,6 +1233,27 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>> struct mmc_ios *ios)
>> goto out;
>>
>> /*
>> + * get/put runtime_pm usage counter at ios->clock transitions
>> + * We need to do
2011/1/25 Tardy, Pierre :
> Actually in sdhci, you power off the MMC IP block, you power OFF the
> MCLK (at least on our platform)
>
> I don't know other platform where mmc clock is not controlled more or
> less directlty by the sdhc IP.
This is the case with host/mmci.c.
It is taking a clock in
> -Original Message-
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:11 PM
> To: Chris Ball
> Cc: Tardy, Pierre; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Ohad Ben-Cohen; linux-omap
> Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3]mmc: imple
2011/1/20 Chris Ball :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:45:57AM +, Tardy, Pierre wrote:
>> Chris,
>> (Sorry for top posting)
>> Seems we have a intel intern disagreement.
>>
>> Could we have maintainer opinion on this ?
>
> Linus W and Ohad, any input here? Thanks,
What I see is orthogonal purpos
