Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 15:06:25, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mohammed, Afzal [120614 01:59]:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:58:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> > > devices should indicate if they use the write-protect pin and we should
> > > either have this "enable on boot" as a global setting not sp
* Mohammed, Afzal [120614 01:59]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:58:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>
> > > Presently there are no peripherals in mainline turning on writeprotect,
> > > initially intention was to just disable writeprotect at the end of probe
> > > and not provide platforms opp
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:58:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> > Presently there are no peripherals in mainline turning on writeprotect,
> > initially intention was to just disable writeprotect at the end of probe
> > and not provide platforms opportunity to enable writeprotect as none
> > need
Hi Afzal,
On 06/13/2012 01:10 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 00:12:27, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>
>> I am still wondering if we should warn against multiple devices using
>> the wait pin. I see that if could be valid to have multiple memory
>> devices of the same type
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 00:12:27, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> I am still wondering if we should warn against multiple devices using
> the wait pin. I see that if could be valid to have multiple memory
> devices of the same type using the WP pin spanning multiple CS. However,
> in that case would
On 06/11/2012 09:27 AM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> GPMC has a writeprotect pin that can be connected to
> peripherals. If any CS wants to enable writeprotect,
> writeprotect will be enabled, once CS configurations
> are finished.
I am still wondering if we should warn against multiple devices using
