* Pedanekar, Hemant [110209 20:42]:
> Tony Lindgren wrote on Thursday, February 10, 2011 7:18 AM:
>
> > * Tony Lindgren [110209 17:45]:
> >>
> >> We should just have separate struct map_desc omapti816x_io_desc[] then.
> >> Maybe have a common struct map_desc omap3_io_desc[] and then separate
>
Tony Lindgren wrote on Thursday, February 10, 2011 7:18 AM:
> * Tony Lindgren [110209 17:45]:
>>
>> We should just have separate struct map_desc omapti816x_io_desc[] then.
>> Maybe have a common struct map_desc omap3_io_desc[] and then separate
>> omap3xxx_io_desc and omapti816x_io_desc?
>
> Oh
* Tony Lindgren [110209 17:45]:
>
> We should just have separate struct map_desc omapti816x_io_desc[] then.
> Maybe have a common struct map_desc omap3_io_desc[] and then separate
> omap3xxx_io_desc and omapti816x_io_desc?
Oh and this will work just fine for map_io without having cpu_is_omap
mac
* Hemant Pedanekar [110209 08:54]:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,16 @@ static struct map_desc omap243x_io_desc[] __initdata = {
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAPTI816X
> +static struct map_desc omap34xx_io
