On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 11:03 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> As promised (but too late?):
>
> Acked-by: Brian Norris
No, not late, I rebase my l2 tree with no shame :-) But once the patch
hits the real mtd tree, then we never change it. So, I've added you tag,
thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityut
; Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed; linux-
o...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix
to
g; Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed; linux-
> > o...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: nand: Fix bad block identification issue
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
> > > This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedeki...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:01 PM
> To: Saxena, Parth; Brian Norris
> Cc: linux-...@lists.infradead.org; Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed; linux-
> o...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
> > This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
> > badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix
> > to the problem in nand_base.c.
>
> But it l
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:39 +0530, Saxena, Parth wrote:
> This patch solves the above issue for omap by initialising
> badblockbits. We are working further on this to find a generic fix
> to the problem in nand_base.c.
But it looks like the generic solution is to return the line which was
accident
Hi,
On 4/27/2011 8:45 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> Brian,
>
> did you really intend to remove badblockbits? Maybe it should go back
> to nand_base.c?
No, I had no intention of the sorts! It surely should not have been
removed in the first place. I will "ack" a patch to revert it, or next
time
Brian,
did you really intend to remove badblockbits? Maybe it should go back
to nand_base.c?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Saxena, Parth wrote:
> Commit e0b58d0 ("mtd: nand: add ->badblockbits for minimum number
> of set bits in bad block byte") by Maxim Levitsky added
> badblockbits to nand_
