RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-12-27 Thread Aggarwal, Anuj
er (Nokia-D/Tampere); > > linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume > failure > > fix > > > > > > Looking at the very original patch, I don't know how things could > get > > > > into deep

RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-12-24 Thread Aggarwal, Anuj
-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure > fix > > > > Looking at the very original patch, I don't know how things could get > > > into deep sleep by disabling the fclk only... need to disable the iclk > &g

RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-30 Thread Aggarwal, Anuj
> > Looking at the very original patch, I don't know how things could get > > into deep sleep by disabling the fclk only... need to disable the iclk > > also. In threshold mode, HW autogates the iclk, so you may be just > > "lucky". > [Anuj] No, I am not :(. I had to modify the original patch to in

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-20 Thread Anuj Aggarwal
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Eero Nurkkala wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:53 +0100, ext Jarkko Nikula wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:51:13 +0200 >> Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> >> > > My question is: is sysfs the only way to choose threshold or can it be >> > > made >> > >  as default? I co

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-20 Thread Eero Nurkkala
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:53 +0100, ext Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:51:13 +0200 > Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > > My question is: is sysfs the only way to choose threshold or can it be > > > made > > > as default? I could not see that happening in the code so thinking of the > >

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-20 Thread Jarkko Nikula
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:51:13 +0200 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > My question is: is sysfs the only way to choose threshold or can it be made > > as default? I could not see that happening in the code so thinking of the > > possible reason of choosing not to do so. Because the user who wants to > >

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On Thursday 19 November 2009 21:48:26 ext Anuj Aggarwal wrote: > [Anuj] Yes, w/o audio, it goes into suspend neatly. > After going through the entire patch series "[PATCHv5 00/20] OMAP > ASoC changes in DMA utilization", which I missed earlier, I found that the > sysfs entry dma_op_mode can be togg

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-19 Thread Anuj Aggarwal
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Aggarwal, Anuj wrote: > >> > If no API or feature would require active McBSP block before the >> > omap_mcbsp_start call, then the clock management could be done inside >> > the omap_mcbsp_start/-stop function

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-13 Thread Mark Brown
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; peter.ujfal...@nokia.com; Wang, Jane Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix On 13 Nov 2009, at 17:39, Jane Wang wrote: McBSP fucntional clock is not disabled when suspend is triggerd which prevents PER domain entering target

RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure fix

2009-11-13 Thread Wang, Jane
er.ujfal...@nokia.com; Wang, Jane > Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3: MCBSP: Suspend/resume failure > fix > > On 13 Nov 2009, at 17:39, Jane Wang wrote: > > > McBSP fucntional clock is not disabled when suspend is triggerd which > > prevents PER domain enterin