RE: RE: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

2013-01-28 Thread Mohammed, Afzal
Hi Mike, On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:05:24, Mike Turquette wrote: Thank you for the information. In short, the way you program your clock depend on the configuration of your lcdc device. As such I am not sure the basic divider is the right choice for you. You might be better off creating a

RE: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

2013-01-25 Thread Mohammed, Afzal
Hi Mike, On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:36:30, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:29:15) It is a functional constraint: divider has 8 bits and it can have all possible values (0 to 255) and divider value corresponds to value set in the 8 bits. But depending on the

Re: RE: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

2013-01-25 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-25 04:06:41) Hi Mike, On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:36:30, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:29:15) It is a functional constraint: divider has 8 bits and it can have all possible values (0 to 255) and divider value corresponds

Re: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

2013-01-24 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Mohammed, Afzal (2013-01-24 03:29:15) Hi Mike, On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:10:53, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Afzal Mohammed (2013-01-23 03:38:52) Some of clocks can have a limit on minimum divider value that can be programmed, prepare for such a support. Add a new