2010/9/22 tom.leim...@gmail.com:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch sets scheduler policy of twl4030 irq thread
(twl4030_irq_thread) as SCHED_FIFO to speedup irq response
time, just like taken by kernel threaded irq in irq_thread
(kernel/irq/manage.c). Also higher priority than
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:49:31AM +0800, tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch sets scheduler policy of twl4030 irq thread
(twl4030_irq_thread) as SCHED_FIFO to speedup irq response
time, just like taken by kernel threaded irq in irq_thread
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your comment.
2010/9/27 Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:49:31AM +0800, tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch sets scheduler policy of twl4030 irq thread
(twl4030_irq_thread) as
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:25:24AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
2010/9/27 Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com:
Wouldn't converting your twl4030_irq_thread() to the threaded IRQ framework
fix that problem ?
IRQ_DISABLED flag is set by disable_irq_nosync called from PIH handler,
then thread
CC genirq guys
2010/9/28 Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:25:24AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
2010/9/27 Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com:
Wouldn't converting your twl4030_irq_thread() to the threaded IRQ framework
fix that problem ?
IRQ_DISABLED
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:01:32PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
2010/9/28 Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com:
Have you raised this issue with the genirq guys? This sounds like
something that the core infrastructure should be able to cope with.
Even genirq guys can help us to convert
