On 04/15/2015 01:44 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:51:32AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> I am yet to post a new revision to this series - few other stuff got
>> in the way. IODelay driver in no way removes the constraint that the
>> SoC architecture has - most of the pin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:51:32AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I am yet to post a new revision to this series - few other stuff got
> in the way. IODelay driver in no way removes the constraint that the
> SoC architecture has - most of the pins still need to be muxed in
> bootloader - we cannot
On 04/14/2015 08:29 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:41:51PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Yeah agreed. I suggest discussing the binding and the generic
>> parsing code for it first :)
>>
>> It seems with the generic binding the actual driver should be
>> just the hardwar
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:41:51PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Yeah agreed. I suggest discussing the binding and the generic
> parsing code for it first :)
>
> It seems with the generic binding the actual driver should be
> just the hardware specific code hopefully.
Did this thread go anywhere
* Linus Walleij [150317 18:31]:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 03/10/2015 12:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> >> Yes except I'd make use of some kind of #pinctrl-cells here just like
> >> interrupt controller has #interrupt-cells. Then you can have the values
> >>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 12:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Yes except I'd make use of some kind of #pinctrl-cells here just like
>> interrupt controller has #interrupt-cells. Then you can have the values
>> seprate and the controller knows what to do
* Linus Walleij [150310 03:39]:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> > +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl-single:
> > +The groups of pin configuration are defined under "pinctrl-single,pins"
> > +
> > +&dra7_iodelay_core {
> > + mmc2_iodel
On 03/10/2015 01:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 12:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Nishanth Menon [150310 10:25]:
>>> On 03/10/2015 10:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Linus Walleij [150310 03:39]:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
>> +Configu
On 03/10/2015 12:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon [150310 10:25]:
>> On 03/10/2015 10:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Linus Walleij [150310 03:39]:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl
* Nishanth Menon [150310 10:25]:
> On 03/10/2015 10:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Linus Walleij [150310 03:39]:
> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>
> >>> +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl-single:
> >>> +The groups of pin configuration
On 03/10/2015 10:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Linus Walleij [150310 03:39]:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>>> +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl-single:
>>> +The groups of pin configuration are defined under "pinctrl-single,pins"
>>> +
On 03/10/2015 05:39 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
>> +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl-single:
>> +The groups of pin configuration are defined under "pinctrl-single,pins"
>> +
>> +&dra7_iodelay_core {
>> + mmc
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> +Configuration definition follows similar model as the pinctrl-single:
> +The groups of pin configuration are defined under "pinctrl-single,pins"
> +
> +&dra7_iodelay_core {
> + mmc2_iodelay_3v3_conf: mmc2_iodelay_3v3_conf {
> +
13 matches
Mail list logo
