* Santosh Shilimkar [111006 23:18]:
>
> Are you considering this change for 3.2?
I think we should as this is blocking development for
generic map_io and genalloc changes for SRAM code.
> OMAP4 errata WA would have a conflict with the
> change is sram code and hence the question ?
Right, let's
On Thursday 06 October 2011 03:43 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nicolas Pitre [111004 17:34]:
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>>> This allows us to remove omap hacks for map_io.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
>>
>> Nice cleanup.
>>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre
>
> This one nee
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nicolas Pitre [111004 17:34]:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > > This allows us to remove omap hacks for map_io.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
> >
> > Nice cleanup.
> >
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre
>
> This one need
* Nicolas Pitre [111004 17:34]:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > This allows us to remove omap hacks for map_io.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
>
> Nice cleanup.
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre
This one needed minor changes for the omap1 omap_sram_init
call. Updated patch
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> This allows us to remove omap hacks for map_io.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
Nice cleanup.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c | 19 +---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c | 69
> +--