On Fri 2013-02-22 08:00:44, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Any comments on this approach? Is it better to merge mkfitsrc.sh with
mkuboot.sh?
I know this was discussed quite extensively yesterday, but here is my take on
it:
Given
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2013-02-22 08:00:44, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Any comments on this approach? Is it better to merge mkfitsrc.sh with
mkuboot.sh?
I know this was
On Mon 2013-03-18 16:44:26, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2013-02-22 08:00:44, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Any comments on this approach? Is it better to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
What I wanted to say is that kernel build traditionaly produced
something useful, something bootloader can actually boot. Currently,
make uImage produces u-boot image. Please keep that capability.
Unfortunately, there is a
On Mon 2013-03-18 17:57:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
What I wanted to say is that kernel build traditionaly produced
something useful, something bootloader can actually boot. Currently,
make uImage produces u-boot image.
Dear Russell,
In message 20130318175746.gj30...@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk you wrote:
Unfortunately, there is a fundamental problem with uImage. It encodes
the load address, and that is utterly incompatible with the goal of
having a kernel image which boots on multiple platforms.
I'm not sure
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build support
in the kernel.
With the move to multiplatform support on
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Any comments on this approach? Is it better to merge mkfitsrc.sh with
mkuboot.sh?
I know this was discussed quite extensively yesterday, but here is my take on
it:
Given the recent complications from multiplatform, we really saw
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build support
in the kernel.
With the move to multiplatform support on OMAP, I feel it is a good
time to add FIT support, also looking at the proliferating number
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/2013 05:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello, I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT
build support in the kernel. With the move to multiplatform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2013 11:26 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello, I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT
build support in the kernel. With the move to multiplatform
support on OMAP, I feel it is
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:20:56AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/21/2013 05:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello, I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT
build support in the kernel. With the move to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/2013 08:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:20:56AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/21/2013 05:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:37:10PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes
wrote:
Hello,
(Dropped uboot mailing list because it constantly holds my mails for
moderation.)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/21/2013 08:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
We're about to make it harder how? By forcing them to use DT
blobs? Or by forcing them to have
On 02/21/2013 09:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
(Dropped uboot mailing list because it constantly holds my mails for
moderation.)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/21/2013 08:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
We're about to make it harder how? By
Dear Russell,
In message 20130221134656.gc17...@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk you wrote:
Note that FIT images are relatively old (docs date back to March
2008). This is more of another effort to try and update what the
kernel uses.
So it's five years old and people haven't been that
[uboot list deleted again]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:37:07PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Russell,
In message 20130221134656.gc17...@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk you wrote:
Note that FIT images are relatively old (docs date back to March
2008). This is more of another effort to try
On 02/21/2013 12:15 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build support
in the kernel.
With the move to
On 02/21/2013 06:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 02/20/2013 11:26 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello, I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for
FIT build support in the kernel. With the move to
multiplatform support on OMAP, I feel it is a
On 02/21/2013 01:58 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 12:15 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build support
in the kernel.
With the move to multiplatform support on OMAP, I feel it is a good
time to add FIT support, also looking at the proliferating number of
dtbs, as it
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 02/20/2013 06:37 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I've been spinning some work-in-progress patches for FIT build support
in the kernel.
With the move to multiplatform support on OMAP, I feel it is a good
time
22 matches
Mail list logo
