+ more DT maintainers folks
Hi all,
I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(
I'd like to know if this is the right direction and if it worth pursuing
in that direction.
The idea was to have at least som
On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> + more DT maintainers folks
>
> Hi all,
>
> I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
> little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(
>
> I'd like to know if this is the right direction and if it worth pursu
Hi Rob,
On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ more DT maintainers folks
Hi all,
I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(
I'd like to know if this is the r
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >> + more DT maintainers folks
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
> >> little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>>
>>> + more DT maintainers folks
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
>>> lit
On 09/24/2013 10:52 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion that happened during LCE-2013 and the email
> thread started by Tomasz few months ago [1], here is a first attempt
> to introduce:
> - a schema language to define the bindings accurately
> - DTS validation during
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > >> + more DT maintainers folks
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I w
Hi Jon,
On 01/10/2013 17:17, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ more DT maintainers folks
Hi all,
I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
little bit of comments about at least the bi
> >
> > Benoit,
> >
> > Sorry, I meant to ask earlier but forgot.
> > Shouldn't this development be based on the
> > upstream DTC repository and not the in-kernel
> > copy of the DTC?
>
> Eventually, yes,
We should *start* there, though.
> but here the main point is to discuss the schema that
>
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:54:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> >
> > On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> + more DT maintainers folks
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 08:17:42AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > + more DT maintainers folks
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
> > little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:22:24PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 10:52 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Following the discussion that happened during LCE-2013 and the email
> > thread started by Tomasz few months ago [1], here is a first attempt
> > to introduce:
> > -
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:54:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:54:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I would expect the schema to replace
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/* over time. I think the thing that
> > needs to be worked out here is how to add free form mu
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:08:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:54:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:54:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > > I would expect the schema to replace
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/* over time. I think the
On 02/10/2013 15:54, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:54:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ more DT maintainers folks
Hi all,
Hi Stephen,
On 02/10/2013 00:22, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/24/2013 10:52 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi All,
Following the discussion that happened during LCE-2013 and the email
thread started by Tomasz few months ago [1], here is a first attempt
to introduce:
- a schema language to define the
Hi David,
On 02/10/2013 16:29, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:22:24PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/24/2013 10:52 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi All,
Following the discussion that happened during LCE-2013 and the email
thread started by Tomasz few months ago [1], here is a
Rob Herring in devicetree/msg06598.html
> This is interesting approach using the dts syntax,
Benoit Cousson in devicetree/msg06617.html
> it has the big advantage of re-using the parser already included in DTC for
> free. In term or readability, it avoids to re-defining a brand new syntax for
> pe
18 matches
Mail list logo
