On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:48:41PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
actually, I didn't miss you at all. your broo...@linaro.org was in Cc
of original email thread. The same email which was used to sign-off on
original commit.
It's not what's advertised in MAINTAINERS, you should be sending stuff
to
On 11/21/2013 11:36 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
FYI, the way I deal with this is that my preferred email account
subscribes to the mailing list, and I have a filter such that
anything that's to/cc either *that* email address *or* any
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
FYI, the way I deal with this is that my preferred email account
subscribes to the mailing list, and I have a filter such that anything
that's to/cc either *that* email address *or* any of my other email
addresses gets handled
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:44:23AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
Ah yes. I also have a delivery-time filter that remembers the last n
Message-Id headers I've received, and it dumps any duplicates into a
separate folder that I ignore. It seems to work pretty well. It looks
like n==1 for me
On 11/21/2013 03:49 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:48:41PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
actually, I didn't miss you at all. your broo...@linaro.org was
in Cc of original email thread. The same email which was used to
sign-off on original commit.
It's not what's advertised
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:49:11AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:48:41PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
actually, I didn't miss you at all. your broo...@linaro.org was in Cc
of original email thread. The same email which was used to sign-off on
original commit.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:27:06PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
If you have one email address listed in MAINTAINERS, and do all your
actual work with another identity, you might want to look at your
workflow a bit. I suggest either signing off with the MAINTAINERS
The only thing that uses the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:50:50PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
/me notes that he'd probably have been less grumpy if the message had
a subject line that had content in it, even had it gone to the right
oh cut the crap already. It contained the commit sha1 and a pretty
self-explanatory
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:48:41PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
actually, I didn't miss you at all. your broo...@linaro.org was in Cc
of original email thread. The same email which was used to sign-off on
original commit.
Hi,
commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 (regulator: fixed: get
rid of {get|list}_voltage()) regresses any MMC host controller which
uses fixed regulator for functionality.
Note that mmc core uses regulator_list_voltage() to setup OCR mask and
that has a check for missing
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:58:14AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 (regulator: fixed: get
rid of {get|list}_voltage()) regresses any MMC host controller which
uses fixed regulator for functionality.
This is already fixed in -next. Please remember to
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:34:00PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:58:14AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 (regulator: fixed: get
rid of {get|list}_voltage()) regresses any MMC host controller which
uses fixed regulator
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:51:43PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:34:00PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:58:14AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 (regulator: fixed: get
rid of
13 matches
Mail list logo
