On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> It's somehow a known issue. We are facing issues with dev.omapzoom.org and
> git.omapzoom.org servers and we are trying to resolve them.
Thanks. The http one worked, but it took *ages*.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this
; Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:46 PM
> To: Ramirez Luna, Omar
> Cc: linux-omap; Hiroshi Doyu; Ameya Palande; Artem
> Bityutskiy; Shah, Bhavin; Tony Lindgren; Felipe Contreras
> Subject: Re: dspbridge sync proposal for 0.1
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Ramirez Luna, Omar
&g
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> After the analysis of both branches (current dspbridge and dspbridge-0.1) and
> the need to resend the patches that haven't been reviewed. It was decided
> that the unsent patches would be reverted and sent to the list for review,
> g
Hi,
>From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contre...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:04 AM
>
>On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> There is a proposal to get the dspbridge branch into a decent state for
>> the 0.1 release, so I've been trying to synchronize t
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> There is a proposal to get the dspbridge branch into a decent state for
> the 0.1 release, so I've been trying to synchronize the internal maemo
> branch with the upstream one.
After a few private discussions with Omar here's v2 which is
e
Hello Omar,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> There is a proposal to get the dspbridge branch into a decent state for
>> the 0.1 release, so I've been trying to synchronize the internal maemo
>> branch with t
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a proposal to get the dspbridge branch into a decent state for
> the 0.1 release, so I've been trying to synchronize the internal maemo
> branch with the upstream one.
>
> Unfortunately, there are severe issues:
> * T
Hi,
There is a proposal to get the dspbridge branch into a decent state for
the 0.1 release, so I've been trying to synchronize the internal maemo
branch with the upstream one.
Unfortunately, there are severe issues:
* TI modified the patches sent by Nokia
* Many patches have never been sent to