On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 06:26:14PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Olof's autobooter wrote:
> > [2.816920] smps9: failed to get the current voltage
> This seems to be from palmas registration failing, which in turns
> causes vmmc regulator lookup to fail. See t
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 06:26:14PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Olof's autobooter wrote:
>
>> > [2.816920] smps9: failed to get the current voltage
>
>> This seems to be from palmas registration failing, wh
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 12:37:52PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Always CC maintainers on things.
> What maintainer did I not cc? I missed the linux-omap list but I
> included you and Tony.
Liam mainly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Minor change in subject, +Keerthy.
On 10:01-20140604, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 06:26:14PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Olof's autobooter wrote:
>
> > > [2.816920] smps9: failed to get the current voltage
>
> > This seems to be from palm
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:34:31PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Seems to help my OMAP5uevm.
> If this makes sense, I will repost it as a formal patch.
Yes, this makes sense - there was a similar issue with one of the other
drivers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:34:31PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Seems to help my OMAP5uevm.
> If this makes sense, I will repost it as a formal patch.
Actually I just went ahead and applied this - thanks!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
