On 04/06/2015 10:36 AM, Ryan wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 04/06/2015 06:42 AM, Ryan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 04/01/2015 08:18 AM, Ryan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like
Hi Nishanth,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 04/06/2015 06:42 AM, Ryan wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/01/2015 08:18 AM, Ryan wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask a related question here
>>>
>>> Please try
On 04/06/2015 06:42 AM, Ryan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 04/01/2015 08:18 AM, Ryan wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask a related question here
Please try not to top post :).
If i use performance governor alone - constantly running at the
highest frequency. D
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 04/01/2015 08:18 AM, Ryan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask a related question here
> Please try not to top post :).
>
>>
>> If i use performance governor alone - constantly running at the
>> highest frequency. Does the smart reflex
On 04/01/2015 08:18 AM, Ryan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask a related question here
Please try not to top post :).
>
> If i use performance governor alone - constantly running at the
> highest frequency. Does the smart reflex still has a role to play?
Yes. cpufreq governor are just policie
Hi,
I would like to ask a related question here
If i use performance governor alone - constantly running at the
highest frequency. Does the smart reflex still has a role to play?
Does smart-reflex involves reprogramming only the mpu power line alone?
Regards,
Ryan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:17
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ran Shalit [150321 12:18]:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> >> We currently are missing dm8148 support from mainline, dm8168
>> >> does have basic support now. Adding dm8148 will hopefully happen
>> >> too with tim
* Ran Shalit [150321 12:18]:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ran Shalit wrote:
> >> We currently are missing dm8148 support from mainline, dm8168
> >> does have basic support now. Adding dm8148 will hopefully happen
> >> too with time permitting :)
> >>
> >
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > What is exactly
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> We currently are missing dm8148 support from mainline, dm8168
>> does have basic support now. Adding dm8148 will hopefully happen
>> too with time permitting :)
>>
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> What is exactly the "voltage driver" capability ? Does it mean
> We currently are missing dm8148 support from mainline, dm8168
> does have basic support now. Adding dm8148 will hopefully happen
> too with time permitting :)
>
Hi Tony,
What is exactly the "voltage driver" capability ? Does it mean that it
does not support AVS (feature for power saving) ?
Reg
* Ran Shalit [150319 13:05]:
> Hello,
>
> I am using DM8148 and I get error message in boot that voltage
> management driver is not added.
> Is it supported in DM8148. If not - why ?
We currently are missing dm8148 support from mainline, dm8168
does have basic support now. Adding dm8148 will hop
Hello,
I am using DM8148 and I get error message in boot that voltage
management driver is not added.
Is it supported in DM8148. If not - why ?
Thank you,
Ran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majord
12 matches
Mail list logo