On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 AM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> A few folks in my group are working on this (CC'ed). I'd hazard a guess to say
> that the patches can be validated and sent out in another 1-2 weeks - Sourav ?
Any update on the status of the above-mentioned patch for SDIO
interrupt suppor
Hello Steve,
on 01/27/2012 03:09 PM Steve Sakoman said the following:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Your summary below is a pretty accurate description of the current state.
Ok.
> I've made an attempt at creating a patch for 3.2 that follows David
> Vrabel's origin
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Michael Hunold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am experimenting with an SDIO card on the Beagleboard. I have started
>> my experiments with Linux-3.1.4 some time ago and basically everything
>> is working.
>>
>> Except
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experimenting with an SDIO card on the Beagleboard. I have started
> my experiments with Linux-3.1.4 some time ago and basically everything
> is working.
>
> Except the fact that currently no native SDIO interrupts are used, but
Hi,
I am experimenting with an SDIO card on the Beagleboard. I have started
my experiments with Linux-3.1.4 some time ago and basically everything
is working.
Except the fact that currently no native SDIO interrupts are used, but
the status register is polled to recognise the interrupts. Ugh.
So
