Re: resume latency QoS support, unify suspend/resume into idle states

2010-05-28 Thread Arve Hjønnevåg
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: > >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> > On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:49 +0100 >> > Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: >> >> >> >> > This is I

resume latency QoS support, unify suspend/resume into idle states

2010-05-28 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:49 +0100 > > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > >> > >> > This is I believe robust (and has been implemented on some non x86 > >> >