On 12 July 2012 00:27, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 05:28 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>>
>> I suspect this might be specific to 4460 as Rajendra reported it was
>> working for him on 4430 but not on 4460, I haven't tried 4430 but let
>> me see if I can find one.
>
>
> Yes, thi
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:57 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 05:28 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> > I suspect this might be specific to 4460 as Rajendra reported it was
> > working for him on 4430 but not on 4460, I haven't tried 4430 but let
> > me see if I can find one.
>
On Thursday 12 July 2012 05:28 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
I suspect this might be specific to 4460 as Rajendra reported it was
working for him on 4430 but not on 4460, I haven't tried 4430 but let
me see if I can find one.
Yes, this is an issue specific to 4460. The patch 'ARM: OMAP4460:
Work
Hi Kevin,
On 11 July 2012 16:42, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Omar Ramirez Luna writes:
>
>> On 12 June 2012 07:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> ..anyone knows of any more fixes going around?
>>
>> I'm seeing the same thing, it gets stuck trying to enable CPU1, tried
>> this with pm-20120710
Omar Ramirez Luna writes:
> On 12 June 2012 07:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
[...]
>> ..anyone knows of any more fixes going around?
>
> I'm seeing the same thing, it gets stuck trying to enable CPU1, tried
> this with pm-20120710 from linux-omap-pm and current LO master (based
> on 3.5-rc6), also
On 12 June 2012 07:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Friday 08 June 2012 06:46 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 08 June 2012 06:35 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 17:55 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
>>>
On Friday 08 June 2012 06:46 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2012 06:35 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 17:55 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rajendra Nayak [120608 03:40]:
Hi,
I don;t seem to be able to get suspen
On Friday 08 June 2012 06:35 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 17:55 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rajendra Nayak [120608 03:40]:
Hi,
I don;t seem to be able to get suspend to work on 3.5-rc1 on
my 4430 panda. I am not sure i
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 17:55 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Friday 08 June 2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Rajendra Nayak [120608 03:40]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don;t seem to be able to get suspend to work on 3.5-rc1 on
> >> my 4430 panda. I am not sure if its UART wakeups that are
> >>
On Friday 08 June 2012 04:26 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rajendra Nayak [120608 03:40]:
Hi,
I don;t seem to be able to get suspend to work on 3.5-rc1 on
my 4430 panda. I am not sure if its UART wakeups that are
an issue or suspend itself is broken.
Is there anything more than setting
'/sys/devi
* Rajendra Nayak [120608 03:40]:
> Hi,
>
> I don;t seem to be able to get suspend to work on 3.5-rc1 on
> my 4430 panda. I am not sure if its UART wakeups that are
> an issue or suspend itself is broken.
> Is there anything more than setting
> '/sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/tty/ttyO2/power/wa
Hi,
I don;t seem to be able to get suspend to work on 3.5-rc1 on
my 4430 panda. I am not sure if its UART wakeups that are
an issue or suspend itself is broken.
Is there anything more than setting
'/sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/tty/ttyO2/power/wakeup'
to 'enabled' that I need to do to get U
12 matches
Mail list logo
