> ps: you really think that adding more and more ifdefs is better than
> Amit's patch ??
We can avoid using #ifdefs by introducing '.neednop' flag to board_data.
Here is the patch for this which can be used on top of my earlier patch.
--- cut here ---
diff --git a/arch
Hi,
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:07:37AM +0200, ext Gupta, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> >> Attempting to remove usb_nop_xceiv_register() completely will require
> >> someone
> >> with more knowledge of davinci and blackfin archs to comment on what
> >> boards
> >> need the platform_device defined.
> >
> >NA
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:07:37AM +0200, ext Gupta, Ajay Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Here is a compile-tested patch since I haven't seen this fixed in mainline
yet. It applies to the tip of Linus' tree.
Attempting to remove usb_nop_xceiv_register() completely will require
someone
with more knowledge of
Hi,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 01:53:10AM +0200, ext Amit Kucheria wrote:
From 3df714f995b0895e905090760482194233f66a1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<3df714f995b0895e905090760482194233f66a1d.1274570700.git.amit.kuche...@canonical.com>
From: Amit Kucheria
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 01:35:00 +0
Hi,
> Here is a compile-tested patch since I haven't seen this fixed in mainline
> yet. It applies to the tip of Linus' tree.
>
> Attempting to remove usb_nop_xceiv_register() completely will require
> someone
> with more knowledge of davinci and blackfin archs to comment on what
> boards
> need
On 10 Mar 05, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:59:52 -0800, Kevin Hilman
> >> It would be my fault if I wrote those board files. ;)
> >
> > sure, sorry. Maybe I didn't express myself really well.
> >
> >>> I suggest you keep usb as a module, but keep nop xceiv built-in.
writes:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:59:52 -0800, Kevin Hilman
>> It would be my fault if I wrote those board files. ;)
>
> sure, sorry. Maybe I didn't express myself really well.
>
>>> I suggest you keep usb as a module, but keep nop xceiv built-in.
>>
>> Yes, that's the workaround I'm already usi
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:59:52 -0800, Kevin Hilman
> It would be my fault if I wrote those board files. ;)
sure, sorry. Maybe I didn't express myself really well.
>> I suggest you keep usb as a module, but keep nop xceiv built-in.
>
> Yes, that's the workaround I'm already using, but it is not a
Felipe Balbi writes:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:32:40PM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>Yes, I did that intentionally. I *want* USB compiled as a module. If
>>I do that, the build fails, and that's a bug that needs to be fixed.
>
> it depends on where you're calling usb_nop_xceiv_register(),
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:32:40PM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote:
Yes, I did that intentionally. I *want* USB compiled as a module. If
I do that, the build fails, and that's a bug that needs to be fixed.
it depends on where you're calling usb_nop_xceiv_register(), if you're
calling from a fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:03 PM
> To: Gupta, Ajay Kumar
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: usb_nop_xceiv_register() missing when OTG built as modules
>
> &qu
> Subject: usb_nop_xceiv_register() missing when OTG built as modules
>>
>> This just started happening with v2.6.33.
>>
>> On OMAP3EVM, usb_nop_xceiv_register() is called in the board file,
>> but if USB gadget support is built as a module, this causes a link
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 5:39 AM
> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: usb_nop_xceiv_register() missing when OTG built as
This just started happening with v2.6.33.
On OMAP3EVM, usb_nop_xceiv_register() is called in the board file,
but if USB gadget support is built as a module, this causes a link
error (below)
This is obviously broken, and this hook needs to be fixed to work when
called as a module.
To reproduce, s
14 matches
Mail list logo
