Re: v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

2009-06-27 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Friday 26 June 2009 16:43:52 Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto wrote: But in user space there is nothing changed having access to device and control them. As you know, subdev and int-device is all about how to bind interface(or host?) and device and make them communicated each

Re: v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

2009-06-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Friday 26 June 2009 07:27:15 Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: Hello, On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Gary Thomasg...@mlbassoc.com wrote: Still trying to wrap my head around the OMAP/34xx camera support. I need to use the TVP5150 sensor/controller, but the existing driver uses

RE: v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

2009-06-26 Thread Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto
But in user space there is nothing changed having access to device and control them. As you know, subdev and int-device is all about how to bind interface(or host?) and device and make them communicated each other. But using subdev device driver with int-device supporting interface (or

v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

2009-06-25 Thread Gary Thomas
Still trying to wrap my head around the OMAP/34xx camera support. I need to use the TVP5150 sensor/controller, but the existing driver uses v4l_subdev. The working examples I've found (from Sergio's tree) use sensors like ov3640 with uses v4l2_int_device Are these two totally separate beasts? If

Re: v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

2009-06-25 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hello, On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Gary Thomasg...@mlbassoc.com wrote: Still trying to wrap my head around the OMAP/34xx camera support. I need to use the TVP5150 sensor/controller, but the existing driver uses v4l_subdev.  The working examples I've found (from Sergio's tree) use sensors