On Sat 2015-05-30 04:24:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Commit 3eea8b5d68c8 introduced a dependency between touchscreen-max-*
and touchscreen-fuzz-*, so that either both must be specified or none
of them. If only one of them is specified the other value will be
reset to 0. This commit restores
On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:25:45 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be wrote:
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-main.c | 2 +-
drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c |
On Fri 2015-05-29 22:03:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:49:55PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:32:11PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Fix dts to match what the Linux kernel expects. This works around
touchscreen problems in 4.1 linux on
On 29 May 2015 at 17:50, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
I believe some TI kernels use strongly-ordered mappings, mainline
kernel does not. Which kernel version are you using?
Normally I periodically rebuild based on Robert C Nelson's -bone
kernel (but with heavily customized config). I
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only,
Hello Paul,
On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/
The cmt3517 seems to have these some In-Band errors.
Do you happen to know where
