From: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
This reverts commit b6be18f0bab68ed304ebbb2d787d1c36237eda62.
Revert the patch so that we remove any opportunity of SR disable/enable
and any device_scale transitions from conflicting with suspend/resume
path by moving the sr enable/disable activity to the very
Salut Jean,
On 1/25/2012 4:16 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
From: Nishanth Menonn...@ti.com
This reverts commit b6be18f0bab68ed304ebbb2d787d1c36237eda62.
That weird, because you revert a patch you introduced just before:
[PATCH 03/21] OMAP3+: PM: SR: add suspend/resume handlers
Moreover this commit
Hi Benoit,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Salut Jean,
On 1/25/2012 4:16 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
From: Nishanth Menonn...@ti.com
This reverts commit b6be18f0bab68ed304ebbb2d787d1c36237eda62.
That weird, because you revert a patch you introduced
On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com wrote:
Salut Jean,
On 1/25/2012 4:16 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
From: Nishanth Menonn...@ti.com
This reverts commit b6be18f0bab68ed304ebbb2d787d1c36237eda62.
That weird,
Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
[...]
I guess that path #3 and #5 should just be removed.
I am ok with both options (keeping or removing the 2 commits), please
let me know what you prefer.
I guess that removing both is the only acceptable
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:49, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
[...]
I guess that path #3 and #5 should just be removed.
I am ok with both options (keeping or removing the 2 commits), please
let me know
Hi Nishant,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Menon, Nishanth n...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:49, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
[...]
I guess that path #3 and #5 should just be removed.
I
